back to go(o)d
September 3, 2010 §
Recently, something about Stephen Hawking has been the most trending topic at twitter. It is his statement on his latest book, “The Grand Design” and here is the-most-doubtable-statement-for-now,
“It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going. Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. “
Also in another occasion he said,
“That makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions – the single sun, the lucky combination of Earth-sun distance and solar mass – far less remarkable, and far less compelling as evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings.”
Stephen Hawking, I read a lot about his articles, since I was a kid. The first time I read about him, at the moment I read “Bobo”. A deep symphaty to know someone with motor neuron diseases, but also brilliant (by that time he has already written about The Big Bang Theory). I like physics, but I’m not the one who is into that subject. I only read his biography and a few articles, unconsciously I’ve had schemes of comparisson of him and Einstein, and also a little with Darwin.
People’s opinion considered to take most of their theory as “There is no God”-statement. But instead of that opinion, I keep on thinking in this basic assumption pattern,
“Everything might happened spontaneously, but neither a creature as a humankind yet able to explain who set them to happen. “
God, if you are still exist somewhere, you know, I am not here to doubt your existence, indeed, I’m here to proof your existence. But still, there is a probability of negation.